To be more precise, this theorem claims that if we write a finite list of prime numbers, we will always be able to find another prime number that is not on the list.
To prove this theorem, it is not enough to point out an additional prime number for a specific given list. For instance, if we point out 31 as a prime number outside the list of first 10 primes mentioned before, we will indeed show that that list did not include all prime numbers.
But perhaps by adding 31 we have now found all of the prime numbers, and there are no more? What we need to do, and what Euclid did 2, years ago, is to present a convincing argument why, for any finite list, as long as it may be, we can find a prime number that is not included in it.
If you pick a number that is not composite, then that number is prime itself. Otherwise, you can write the number you chose as a product of two smaller numbers. If each of the smaller numbers is prime, you have expressed your number as a product of prime numbers. If not, write the smaller composite numbers as products of still smaller numbers, and so forth.
In this process, you keep replacing any of the composite numbers with products of smaller numbers. Since it is impossible to do this forever, this process must end and all the smaller numbers you end up with can no longer be broken down, meaning they are prime numbers.
As an example, let us break down the number 72 into its prime factors:. We will demonstrate the idea using the list of the first 10 primes but notice that this same idea works for any finite list of prime numbers. Let us multiply all the numbers in the list and add one to the result. Let us give the name N to the number we get. The value of N does not actually matter since the argument should be valid for any list.
The number N , just like any other natural number, can be written as a product of prime numbers. Who are these primes, the prime factors of N? We do not know, because we have not calculated them, but there is one thing we know for sure: they all divide N.
But the number N leaves a remainder of one when divided by any of the prime numbers on our list 2, 3, 5, 7,…, 23, This is supposed to be a complete list of our primes, but none of them divides N. So, the prime factors of N are not on that list and, in particular, there must be new prime numbers beyond Have you found all the prime numbers smaller than ? Which method did you use? Did you check each number individually, to see if it is divisible by smaller numbers?
If this is the way you chose, you definitely invested a lot of time. Eratosthenes Figure 1 , one of the greatest scholars of the Hellenistic period, lived a few decades after Euclid. He served as the chief librarian in the library of Alexandria , the first library in history and the biggest in the ancient world.
Among other things, he designed a clever way to find all the prime numbers up to a given number. Since this method is based on the idea of sieving sifting the composite numbers, it is called the Sieve of Eratosthenes. We will demonstrate the sieve of Eratosthenes on the list of prime numbers smaller than , which is hopefully still in front of you Figure 2.
Circle the number 2, since it is the first prime number, and then erase all its higher multiples, namely all the composite even numbers.
Move on to the next non-erased number, the number 3. Which of the following statements is not correct? I dont understand why prime numbers are so important. Anyone who can help me? Does there exist a number that is perfect and odd?
Are there an infinite number of prime numbers? What is the next odd number after ? Why is 1 not a prime number? What is the largest two digit prime number? Show that if p is an odd prime, then 2 p-1! What is the difference between square root and cube root of a number? For example, 5 is a prime number as it has no positive divisors other than 1 and 5. The first few prime numbers include 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, Prime numbers have applications in basically all areas of arithmetic.
Prime numbers act as "building blocks" of numbers, and in and of itself, it's vital to know prime numbers in order to understand how numbers are associated with one another. Contrary to the prime numbers, a number may be a positive whole number larger than 1 that has two or more positive divisors. For example, 6 may be a number as a result of its 4 positive divisors: 1, 2, 3 and 6. All positive integers larger than 1 should either be a prime integer or a composite one. Adding and Subtracting:.
Similarly, when subtraction is performed, the similar pattern is observed. As you'll be able to see, there are a couple of rules that can tell what the result after you will add, subtract, or multiply even and odd numbers.
In any of those operations, you may continually get a selected quite integer. But after you divide numbers, one thing tough will happen - You may well be left with a fraction. Fractions are neither even numbers nor odd numbers, thus they are not whole numbers as well. They are solely components of numbers and might be written in numerous ways that. That single variety can tell you whether the whole number is odd or even.
Consider the number It ends in 5, an odd number. Composite Numbers Numbers having more than two factors are called as composite numbers. For example: 4, 6, 8, 10 etc are composite numbers. Notes: a 1 is neither prime nor composite. Co-prime Numbers Two numbers are said to be co-prime if they do not have a common factor other than 1 or two numbers whose HCF is 1 called co-prime numbers.
Co-prime numbers needs not be prime numbers. For example: i 7 and 10 are co-prime.
0コメント